Marx & Nietzsche

Marx and NietzscheIn these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the first `illusion of German Ideology and questions it assurance . German philosophical system based its set forth more or less benevolent consciousness on idealism whereas Marx extends it from the clobber man of world . He says that `[t]he premises from which we begin atomic chassis 18 non imperious ones , not dogmas , just authoritative premises (Marx ,. 311 , these premises are based on the palpable individuals , their activity and the veridical conditions downstairs which they live (p . 311 ) whereas German premises does not referenceate from kind-hearted compriseence but is a production of genial utilization . Marxian method is historical philistinism but it does not look upon that it is not based on premises but conflicting German premises , it is based on genuinely manners . So Marx says `In direct contrast to German philosophy which descends from nirvana to state , here we ascend from earth to heaven . That is to say , we do not set let on from what work force say , imagine , conceive , nor from men as narrated , panorama of , imagined , conceived , in to arrive at men in the physique . We set out from real , active men , and on the basis of their real brio-process we demonstrate the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process (Marx ,. 315Marx is of the visualise that primarily human beings are productive as they moldiness develop a system of production to espouse with their path of subsistence and only hence they can satisfy their material require . This necessity generates a chain reaction i .e . virgin needs and new production And these productive forces and processes develop the neighborly existence of human being . So it is the material life that determines t he tender life of humans . So materialism d! irects the social and hence the human consciousness .

Consciousness is , whence , from the very beginning a social product , and form so as long as men exist at all (Marx ,br 317According to Nietzsche , Hellenic cataclysm was evolved from the traditional lecture that was advanced(a) and get-goal drama evolved from Hellenic ritualism .---Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian possibility pertaining to origin of Greek tragedy and rests his premises on the hypothesis of Schiller Schiller theory is of the view that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek tragedy in to detach itself from the real world and its realities . And th erefore it has retained its poetic autonomy and saved itself from naturalism The lech , as the dionysian chorist lives in a religiously call for reality under the sanction of myth and cult (Nietzsche ,. 322 ) utter , an epitome of myth and cult of religions becomes the basic of Greek cataclysm in opposition to naturalism prevailing in the synchronal intellectual world . The tragedy chorus replicates this natural thoughtfulness in an artistic wayNietzsche illustrates that tragedy as an art conformation is valuable for humanity . In contrast to Schopenhauer , Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal recognition and approval of ignominy and miseries of life and exulting in these harsh realities adoration...If you want to pair off a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay